April
11, 2008
NCAA Frozen Four
Frozen Four Championship: Coach's Takes
Inside College Hockey talked to coaches
whose teams have played against the teams involved in Saturday's
national championship. In exchange for anonymity, they gave
us their candid breakdowns of the matchups.
Boston College vs. Notre Dame
Boston College's
forwards …
Notre Dame, being the good Catholic institution that they
are, should pray, because when you face the speed and depth
of speed that they can come at you is what's so impressive.
They just can come at you in waves and when you look at
Gerbe and Ferriero and Whitney, they have some special playmakers
up front. Gerbe's the guy that makes them tick, but what's
impressive is the depth of speed especially and the intensity
with which they attack offensively.
Top-end players versus depth guys
… I feel like it's the best players
that win you these games, but it helps, obviously. Both
teams have depth players when you look at Boston College's
fourth line they have two very big, strong, power-type forwards
which is different than most of the rest of their lineup
and provides a different dimension for them. I still think
normally, your horses are going to win you the title in
these types of games – the Gerbes and Lawsons and
players of that caliber and magnitude. Those guys are going
to have to come and be forces.
Notre Dame's forwards and creativity
… It almost seems like they've found
a little more creativity and ease to their game with their
second lease on life. They probably thought they were maybe
going to miss the tournament or be out with their struggles
down the stretch. In the tournament games now it seems their
offensive confidence and smoothness and the ease with which
they seem to be playing with the puck seems to be a lot
higher than it was. Maybe the pressure of getting back to
the tournament again and establishing themselves as a perennial
tournament team was getting to them at the end of the year.
Now that they got here it seems like they've just gone and
played. It's impressive what they're doing without Erik
Condra, who is their best player, but Ryan Thang obviously
is probably the guy that you look to that makes them tick
with his intensity, his competitiveness and his goal scoring
ability. But a couple of their freshmen – I thought
Ben Ryan and Calle Ridderwall their stick skills were very
high and they made a lot of plays.
Tactics and strategy for the Irish
… Notre Dame's game is still a possession
game and Jeff Jackson is a great tactical coach at taking
care of the puck. Being strong defensively is still what
they want to be. I would guess that the day here in between
of preparation for Notre Dame is that possession is going
to be critical. If the possession arrow goes to Boston College
more tomorrow night and more to their speedy forwards, they're
going to control and dictate the pace of the game and probably
be on the positive end of the scoreboard. You don't want
to get into a track meet with Boston College because they're
probably going to beat you.
Notre Dame's defense …
Most teams in college hockey because of the early signings
and such, probably have two high-end defensemen, the teams
that make the tournament especially. When you look at Notre
Dame, their top six is good, but their top four is special
and guys that are high end college players and guys that
have a chance to go on and play in the National Hockey League.
How Notre Dame responded …
I thought they did a great job in the Michigan game of weathering
the storm and never letting Michigan get too much momentum.
They got that second goal right away but then they stemmed
the tide and controlled the game so well. They transitioned
the puck and broke it out well, and there was never a stretch
of time that Michigan had the puck in Notre Dame's zone
for like a five-minute stretch, whereas that's not usually
the case when you play Michigan. And that's Notre Dame's
strength is that they move the puck so well.
Boston College defense …
I still don't think that's what they consider the strength
of their team but the patchwork of their D corps has been
impressive with Mike Brennan and Carl Sneep and Nick Petrecki
obviously is a special freshman. He really is, the things
he can do offensively and also physically, he can really
change the outcome of the game with how he plays. The D
corps has become real good, but I still think it's their
forwards that make them go. When their forwards are dogging
the puck and are tenacious on the forecheck their defensemen
don't have to spend a lot of time in the D zone and they
don't have that much of the game being pressured upon them.
I think that's the key for Notre Dame to spend a good deal
of time in Boston College's zone cycling, puck possessing,
protecting, and trying to wear down their defensive corps
and keeping Boston College's small, skilled forwards away
from the puck.
The goaltending matchup …
Statistically they both look good, but I think they both
could be vulnerable. Not necessarily an Achilles Heel because
they've both had really good years. Jordan Pearce had a
great year stepping out of David Brown's shadow and John
Muse had a great year as a freshman but I think when you
watched the games in the tournament they both give up a
lot of rebounds, they both punch big rebounds into the slot
on wide angle shots. Pearce has a tendency to give up soft
goals as he did with Michigan last night. That seems to
be the potential issue, probably as much for Notre Dame
as any. Muse gives up the big rebounds and everything but
as a freshman his composure and his ability to handle some
of the big situations in the Hockey East tournament and
the national tournament has been pretty impressive.
Preparation during an off day
… It's interesting, and it's a weird
dynamic having that day off because it's not something in
college hockey that we're used to. Usually we play back-to-back
nights and now you have a lot of time off before the biggest
game of the year and I think you need to resist the urge
to over-coach and over-prepare and to over-hype the game.
What they need to do to win …
Both teams have gotten here for a reason. They've played
on their strengths to get here. Notre Dame is a great tactical
team and they are going to play a very disciplined system,
they are going to be very good defensively and are going
to be very good with the puck. Boston College is a go-go
team. They don't want to be a slow, systematic, rigid team.
They're best at transition, they're at their best when they're
transitioning a little bit and playing to their strengths
which are their speed and aggressiveness. With both coaches
being so well experienced and having won so many big games,
I would see them preparing their teams those ways. Boston
College wants to push the pace at all costs and Notre Dame
probably wants to control the pace at all costs. Whoever
can dictate the pace and tempo, I think, is going to come
out with the better result.